Posts Tagged ‘vbs’

The End of the Vetting and Barring Scheme (as we know it)

Friday, February 11th, 2011

The government announced today that the heavily criticised Vetting and Barring Scheme (VBS) will be significantly scaled back, meaning that millions of adults will no longer need criminal records checks to work or volunteer with children.

According to the Independent, Children’s charity Barnardo’s called the move a “victory for common sense”. Its chief executive Anne Marie Carrie stated “There is already enough safeguarding in place for people who have unsupervised, substantial access to children”, and emphasized that “No system will ever entirely protect children … safeguarding is everybody’s business”.

In Aprl 2010, The Tutor Pages attracted national media coverage with its poll which demonstrated overwhelming opposition to the VBS among private tutors. The government views tuition as a private contract between parents and a tutor, and therefore self-employed private tutors are under no obligation to undergo Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) checks. Although a CRB check may be useful (and tutors can at their own expense apply for one), parents will often prefer other checks, such as talking to parents of current or former students, or following up a tutor’s references.

To further clarify best practice for tutors and parents, The Tutor Pages is currently collaborating in academic research into child protection in the private tuition sector. Results and recommendations will be published later in the year.

Think tank Civitas’ call to scrap the Vetting and Barring Scheme (VBS)

Monday, September 27th, 2010

The independent social policy think tank Civitas has today called for the scrapping of the controversial Vetting and Barring Scheme (VBS). The story has been picked up by the national media, including the BBC. In a press release, the organisation stated:

With the imminent results of the Coalition Government’s major review of the Vetting and Barring Scheme (VBS), which regulates contact between adults and any child not their own, independent think tank Civitas releases a new edition of Licensed to Hug, which insists the Government must get rid of the VBS once and for all. The dramatic escalation of child protection measures, such as the VBS, has created an atmosphere of suspicion that actually increases the risks to children and damages relations between the generations.

In April this year, a poll by The Tutor Pages also revealed widespread opposition to the Scheme among private tutors.

In a recent blog post on Saturday, I summarized the major arguments against the VBS and drew attention to alternative bureaucratic measures for child protection in the private tuition industry, including CRB checks and the recent roll-out of ‘Sarah’s Law’.

New Directions for UK Child Protection

Wednesday, August 18th, 2010

Back in June this year, the UK government announced that the implementation of the controversial Vetting and Barring Scheme (VBS) set up under the previous administration was to be halted while it underwent a thorough review.

The VBS was seen by some tutors and parents as a positive move, because it would have allowed private tutors to register voluntarily and hence ‘prove’ that they were no risk to children and vulnerable adults. In contrast, there were also many who opposed the scheme (for too many reasons to list here – see our interim statement p.2 for details).

Self-employed private tutors have never been under any legal obligation to join the VBS, or to pay for a Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) Enhanced Disclosure certificate to demonstrate their suitability to work with children.

Some would argue that the regulations are not tight enough in this regard. We’ve decided to withold judgement on this issue until there has been some academic research to establish the risk and consequently the necessity for such measures. It is extraordinary that there has never been any such research, and The Tutor Pages is therefore in the early stages of a collaborative project with a British university designed to investigate this area fully.

In the meantime, there have been a couple of interesting developments.

Firstly, the government has recently indicated that the so-called ‘Sarah’s Law’ will be implemented across England and Wales by March 2011. This controversial measure gives parents the right to check with the police if anyone with regular access to their children has a criminal conviction for child sex offences. In simple terms, it is the ‘inverse’ of the flawed VBS system which was originally going to hold the details of millions of innocent people. Though not without its problems, Sarah’s Law may turn out to be a useful tool for parents to check the background of a potential tutor.

Secondly, the government has just launched today its ‘Big Society Deregulation Taskforce’. This taskforce, chaired by Lord Hodgson, will examine how red tape and bureaucracy can be reduced for charities and community organisations. The focus will naturally include the aborted Vetting and Barring Scheme. According to an interview in Third Sector with Nick Hurd, the Minister for Civil Society, ‘the move was part of a wider attempt to rethink the state’s attitude towards risk, which was generating too much regulation’.

In the wake of the disaster which was the VBS, it is encouraging to see moves towards a sensible approach to the management of risk in child protection. I am hopeful that there is indeed a different kind of thinking at Whitehall which will bear fruit for the private tuition industry.