Posts Tagged ‘Criminal Records Bureau’

Private tuition debate on BBC Radio 4: a summary

Thursday, September 9th, 2010

On 7th September, Jane Garvey presented an interesting feature on private tutoring for BBC Radio 4′s Woman’s Hour.

There were interviews with two people who have detailed knowledge about this industry: Janette Wallis from The Good Schools Guide and James Turner, Policy Director at the Sutton Trust.

Below is a handy summary of what I think are some of the key points from their discussion. I hope you find it useful!

Why do parents hire a private tutor?

Janette mentioned there are two reasons why parents hire a tutor: firstly, a child who is struggling in a particular subject can improve their confidence and grades through tutoring. Secondly, there is the more negative aspect where tuition can be ‘contagious’, leading to the so-called tutoring ‘arms race’ among parents.

James agreed with the latter problem, noting there is more competitiveness and pressure than ever before. More children are getting top grades at GCSE and A-level, there’s a squeeze on university places and a squeeze on graduate careers. Parents naturally want to do the best for their child, and so will try to give them the edge.

Who hires private tutors?

James referenced a survey by The Sutton Trust which shows that a fifth of all children have had some form of private tuition over the course of their school careers, rising to more than 40% in London.

Parents of various financial means will make sacrifices to pay for a tutor, but there will still be many parents who can’t afford private tuition at all. As a charity, James mentioned how The Sutton Trust is concerned about those families from poorer backgrounds that miss out.

Janette talked about the type of parent who can’t afford £5000/term for private education, but who does have enough to pay £500/term for private tuition. In other words, these parents will go the state route but ‘top it up’ in certain subjects with a private tutor. She also stated that demand in some circumstances is driven by children themselves who are influenced by their classmates having tutors.

Does all this tutoring mean there is something fundamentally wrong with the state education system?

James noted that although private tuition is most popular in London, state school standards have actually risen faster in London than in other urban areas, so the amount of tuition isn’t necessarily correlated with the standards in state schools. He said how it’s more about an increasing consciousness of the issues and the competitiveness already talked about.

Tuition isn’t regulated in the UK: so how should parents choose a tutor safely?

Janette mentioned three key points in this regard. Firstly, parents should look for a tutor with a CRB check as a basic minimum. Secondly, some parents feel more comfortable if a tutor comes to their house because they feel that it’s a safer environment (although it’s a more expensive option). Finally, she recommended speaking to others who’ve used the tutor to help build up a picture of someone who’s trustworthy.

Does private tuition work?

James mentioned how research proves quite conclusively that private tuition provides the best way of boosting a child’s results. For that reason The Sutton Trust is currently piloting a tuition programme for children from poorer homes, not only to help those children but also to assess exactly effective one-to-one or small group tuition can be.

Janette mentioned there is research that shows how it’s the one-to-one nature of tutoring that works so well, and not necessarily whether a tutor is highly qualified or not. In that respect, parents often underestimate what they can do for their children themselves (on this point see Tutoring: A Tool for the Masses).

On tuition scare stories

A final word from Janette: Whenever I hear that ‘everyone in the class is getting a tutor’, you’ve got to be a little sceptical – it’s like ‘everyone in my class has an iPhone’ – I don’t think it’s always true.

New Directions for UK Child Protection

Wednesday, August 18th, 2010

Back in June this year, the UK government announced that the implementation of the controversial Vetting and Barring Scheme (VBS) set up under the previous administration was to be halted while it underwent a thorough review.

The VBS was seen by some tutors and parents as a positive move, because it would have allowed private tutors to register voluntarily and hence ‘prove’ that they were no risk to children and vulnerable adults. In contrast, there were also many who opposed the scheme (for too many reasons to list here – see our interim statement p.2 for details).

Self-employed private tutors have never been under any legal obligation to join the VBS, or to pay for a Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) Enhanced Disclosure certificate to demonstrate their suitability to work with children.

Some would argue that the regulations are not tight enough in this regard. We’ve decided to withold judgement on this issue until there has been some academic research to establish the risk and consequently the necessity for such measures. It is extraordinary that there has never been any such research, and The Tutor Pages is therefore in the early stages of a collaborative project with a British university designed to investigate this area fully.

In the meantime, there have been a couple of interesting developments.

Firstly, the government has recently indicated that the so-called ‘Sarah’s Law’ will be implemented across England and Wales by March 2011. This controversial measure gives parents the right to check with the police if anyone with regular access to their children has a criminal conviction for child sex offences. In simple terms, it is the ‘inverse’ of the flawed VBS system which was originally going to hold the details of millions of innocent people. Though not without its problems, Sarah’s Law may turn out to be a useful tool for parents to check the background of a potential tutor.

Secondly, the government has just launched today its ‘Big Society Deregulation Taskforce’. This taskforce, chaired by Lord Hodgson, will examine how red tape and bureaucracy can be reduced for charities and community organisations. The focus will naturally include the aborted Vetting and Barring Scheme. According to an interview in Third Sector with Nick Hurd, the Minister for Civil Society, ‘the move was part of a wider attempt to rethink the state’s attitude towards risk, which was generating too much regulation’.

In the wake of the disaster which was the VBS, it is encouraging to see moves towards a sensible approach to the management of risk in child protection. I am hopeful that there is indeed a different kind of thinking at Whitehall which will bear fruit for the private tuition industry.

Government Announcement on Vetting and Barring: No Change for Tutors

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

The government announced yesterday that full implementation of the Vetting and Barring Scheme (VBS) by the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA) will be halted while it undergoes a thorough review.

The confusion will cause a major headache for organisations which have been preparing for the July kick-off of the scheme.

Self-employed private tutors, for whom the VBS is not a statutory requirement, will be no doubt be watching the ensuing chaos with a sense of relief that they don’t need to get involved. Other tutors won’t be so lucky: they’ll still be affected because of their employment by schools or other so-called Regulated Activity Providers (RAPs).

The good thing is, the information in our recent interim statement on private tuition and the VBS still holds true.

We therefore urge all parents, tutors and others concerned about child protection in the private tuition industry to familiarize themselves with the issues by reading it at:

http://www.thetutorpages.com/media-room/june-2010-child-protection-interim-statement.pdf