What’s the cost of hiring a private tutor in the UK?

March 12th, 2013, 1 Comment

The private tuition industry in the UK attracts the most brilliantly preposterous news stories, partly (I would argue) because there’s so little reliable information about it in the public domain.

Take the recent Telegraph article claiming that middle class parents are being ‘priced out’ of the market by the super rich. Apparently, ‘[t]he cost for an average tutor has doubled in four years to around £40 an hour, but those who can guarantee results can charge many times more’. As a result (according to ‘tutoring firms’ with a shameless eye for publicity) salaries of between £50k and £80k are now ‘commonplace’.

In the light of this, it was refreshing to read a new report by First Tutors, one of the UK’s most successful online tuition agencies. Their brief introduction to the industry calculates the average cost per hour of tuition, basing it on solid data from the tens of thousands of tutors on their books. According to them, the average cost of private tuition across all regions of the UK is £21.55 per hour, with surprisingly little regional variation as their graphic below illustrates.

First tutors regional tuition costs diagram

At The Tutor Pages, we would roughly concur. For the thousands of private tutors advertising on The Tutor Pages over the last 5 years, we calculate a median average price of exactly £25/hour. Hence we would also agree with First Tutors’ assertion: that tuition does not have to be for the ‘privileged few’, and that their ‘clients come from a diverse cross-section of British society, all of them wishing to better their children’s prospects’.

One Response to “What’s the cost of hiring a private tutor in the UK?”

  1. Jeff Bragg says:

    I could not agree more. I would say that £25 to £30 per hour is quite standard for my area, which is the SW London and Surrey borders.

Leave a Reply

‘Tutor-proofing’ the 11plus: a discussion on BBC Breakfast

January 31st, 2013, 1 Comment

bbc breakfast

For anyone who missed it, I’ve just transcribed a discussion on ‘tutor-proofing’ the 11plus exam which took place on this morning’s BBC Breakfast programme. In my opinion, it’s a neat summary of some of the key issues.

——

GS: Graham Satchell (BBC News reporter)

CS: Charlie Stayt (BBC Breakfast)

LM: Louise Minchin (BBC Breakfast)

AE: Adrian Elliot (Former headteacher)

JW: Janette Wallis (Senior Editor, Good Schools Guide)

——

GS: Some parents are paying thousands of pounds to private tutors to get their children through exams. Critics say it’s entrenching the divide between rich and poor. Already, children from low income households are half as likely to get five good GCSEs as the rest of their year group. Now some policy makers are trying to limit the impact of private tuition. In Kent, the local authority has decided to change their 11+ exam to make it ‘tutor-proof’: they don’t want parents who can afford private coaching to have an unfair advantage over those who are less well-off.

There are more questions than answers:

  • Is it possible to really have a ‘tutor-proof’ exam?
  • Can there be a level playing field for less well-off children?
  • And, if wealthier parents aren’t happy with their child’s school, is there anything wrong with sending them to a private tutor?

LM: With regard to a tutor-proof exam, can an exam, do you think, be ‘tutor-proof’?

AE: I would have grave doubts about it; I think that the very fact that a child has had the confidence of tutoring perhaps over several months really gives them a great advantage. And there’s no doubt that research which has been done in the United States has suggested that you can’t have a tutor-proof exam … there’s bound to be a bias.

JW: First of all, I’d say it’s a good thing they’re trying, and I think they should be congratulated for at least looking into it. If you speak to tutors, they’ll say, ‘I can come up with a programme for any test’ but of course they would say that, that’s their business! If you speak to Durham University, who design a lot of these ‘uncoachable tests’, they’ll say they can do a pretty good job of coming up with the sort of test that it’s difficult to, or more difficult to, tutor for.

CS: And given your experience of looking at schools, what’s the evidence? Is the evidence that tutoring works – is it as simple as that?

JW: It’s like Adrian said, in a way, any sort of test experience, just doing practice tests in a timed situation, having to concentrate for a long period of time, whatever the content of the tutoring, just doing that will help a lot. The sort of parents who are spending a lot of money on tutoring are also the sort of parents who are ‘hyper-ventilating’ over their children as well. It’s sometimes difficult to pull out how much of it is the tutoring, and how much of it is the parents really wanting their children to excel and giving them help in other ways.

CS: Adrian, how much do you think this messes with which children are bright? In a way, what I’m asking is, ‘If you take two kids who are the same, essentially the same intellect, as capable potentially, and give one tutoring – are you always going to end up with that one getting through’?

AE: I think it makes an enormous difference. I mean, I would start with the premise that the 11+ is a flawed concept anyway – that intelligence is fixed and innate – it isn’t, so there’s a basic problem there. But, yes, I think that it can make a great difference. Certainly, there was some work done in Northern Ireland from a few years ago where of course they did have the 11+ for the whole country, which suggested that tutoring was making a significant difference.

LM: And what about the schools you talk to, what do they say about accepting children they know, or are presumably, tutored?

JW: Headteachers don’t like it. You know, teachers generally don’t feel that children need it. I was just speaking to a headteacher yesterday who was speaking about the ‘professionalization of parenthood’ so that parents now feel that they have to pay to get teachers to teach their children, they have to pay for extra-curricula activities, they can’t raise them themselves. So, generally, it’s not something that’s popular with schools. But, there are exceptions – there’s ‘tutoring’ and there’s ‘tutoring’. There’s of course all sorts of very good reasons for tutoring…

LM: If someone’s not happy with what they’re being taught at school, or how they’re being taught at school?

CS: Or falling behind?

JW: You know, there are some very wholesome reasons. We have people who want to learn a subject that’s not on the curriculum – they want to learn Spanish when their school does French – so they have a private tutor for that. I mean, it’s not always part of the ‘educational arms race’. There are sometimes some nice reasons for it.

CS: So headteachers are left in an impossible position. Even if you want, as a school, to send out a message that ‘we don’t approve of tutoring’, you’re still going to pick the best ones – and they’re probably the ones who’ve been tutored?

AE: I think this is inevitable. Certainly I think there is an issue in some selective authorities where the county primary schools are actually dissuaded from tutoring, or told that they shouldn’t even prepare the children for the 11 plus, whilst this of course doesn’t apply to independent schools, independent prep schools, and now academies and free schools. So you’ve got really a situation that’s basically a mess. My solution would be to look at the whole question of the 11 plus, because I agree with Jeanette, I mean, tutoring certainly can have a role to play in the case of illness, for instance.

CS: It’s intriguing; thank you both for your time this morning.

One Response to “‘Tutor-proofing’ the 11plus: a discussion on BBC Breakfast”

  1. Cerasela Enusca says:

    Thank you Henry for posting this article!

    I am a Modern Foreign Languages teacher and private tutor and I personally have a quite strong opinion on exams in the UK, more specifically on MFL exams, since are those I have experience with.

    Firstly, in my opinion the most worrying and unfair aspect about languages exams in the UK is not the fact that some of the students can afford to be privately prepared and therefore score a better mark, but the fact that schools and teachers prepare the questions and give students the answers before the exams.
    Therefore the real enemy to transparency and fairness is not the private teacher who teaches the subject, but the school teacher who allows students to prepare the exact questions they will be asked in the exam, preventing them from learning the language and being able to use it outside the school environment.

    Most of the times I am contacted by students who want to be tutored in Italian/Spanish because they want to really be able to understand and learn how the language works and not only learn some pre established questions and pass the exams, which is the kind of preparations they receive in schools nowadays.

    In conclusion, instead of creating “tutor-proof exams” they should probably think on how to create “school cheaters -proof exams”. Time and energy should be spent on creating exams which can allow students learn something they could then be able to apply in real life, such as communicating with native speakers and not just answering some pre-set questions.

Leave a Reply

New Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS): What it means for private tutors

January 19th, 2013, 0 Comments

I always take a deep breath before writing anything on child protection: it’s a really complex area. However, there have been some recent developments which are important to private tutors, and to anyone looking to hire one. I’ll try and explain as concisely as I can.

Firstly, a little context. When the Coalition government came to power in 2010, it promised to scale back what were widely seen as draconian child protection measures introduced by the previous Labour government. Under Labour’s ‘Vetting and Barring Scheme’ around nine million UK adults were to be placed on a database; in the current government’s own words:

“This would have been disproportionate and could have perpetuated the belief that everyone who wants to work with vulnerable groups poses a risk … No government-led scheme can ensure that abuse and neglect never occur. Barring checks are only one tool to help employers”

As a result, the law was changed last year under The Protection of Freedoms Act to abolish Labour’s system of registration and monitoring, a scheme much hated and never fully implemented. In its place, as of December 2012, the result is the new and streamlined Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) which, in brief:

  • claims to be ‘proportionate’, reducing the number of positions requiring barring checks to around 5 million;
  • merges the functions of the former Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) and Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA);
  • issues a single criminal records certificate sent only to the applicant, thus allowing individuals to challenge information disclosed about them before it is given to their employer;
  • introduces ‘portable’ criminal records checks. This will put an end to the practice of issuing multiple certificates for every role or position an individual works in – what was perceived as a wasteful aspect of the old system, and the subject of much ridicule. The solution to the problem is the so-called Update Service which, according to the Home Office, ‘will allow individuals (if they choose to subscribe to it, and pay a small fee) to apply for a criminal record check once and then, if they need a similar sort of check again, to reuse their existing certificate, with their organisation checking online to see if it is still up to date’.

 

What does it all mean for private tutors?

For private tutors who have been issued with a CRB certificate by an employer or other organisation, the change means very little in reality. This is because it is the sole responsibility of the employer or organisation to adapt to the new system. However, tutors should be aware that:

  • The new name for a CRB check is a DBS check, and newly issued certificates will be DBS branded;
  • Old CRB branded certificates are still ‘valid’. I say ‘valid’ because CRB/DBS certificates are in effect out-of-date the moment they are issued, and rather amazingly, it is up to the employer to decide how long a certificate should ‘last’. Employers tend to request a new check every three years or so, but according to the Home Office, ‘There are no Government recommendations as to the frequency of re-checks as they only form one part of the recruitment and employment process’.
  • the new Update Service – useful for individuals who have a number of different employers, and who want to ‘port’ their certificate from one employer to the next – will get going this Spring. If you’re interested, you can subscribe to the DBS mailing list to get free updates on this and other developments.

 

What if I’m a self-employed tutor and would like a DBS certificate to show to parents?

A DBS check is not a legal requirement for working as a self-employed tutor, though it is of course a serious criminal offence to seek to work with children after having been barred from doing so. Self-employed individuals have never been able to apply for a DBS certificate themselves, and the new legislation does nothing to change that. There are, however, several options open to the self-employed as follows:

  • Disclosure Scotland. The government’s own advice suggests that a ‘basic check’ can be obtained from Disclosure Scotland (the sister organisation of the DBS), whether an individual lives in Scotland, England or Wales.
  • Contracting organisations. If an organisation contracts with a self-employed person for the delivery of a service, it may involve a DBS certificate. The most obvious option for tutors are private tuition agencies which, as of October 2010, are legally required to process DBS checks for all tutors working with children. Another similar alternative to joining a tuition agency is explained here.
  • Endorsement organisations. Some professional bodies or trade organisations apply for DBS checks on behalf of their members, such as the Musicians’ Union. It is worth contacting any professional bodies relevant to your expertise, and you may therefore find helpful the government’s database of DBS umbrella bodies.
  • ‘Subject Access Request’. This is an option where your local police force provides you with a certificate with similar information to a DBS certificate at the cost of £10. Since local arrangements vary for obtaining an application form, according to the police information website, ‘the easiest way is to telephone your local police and ask to speak to the Data Protection team. In order to complete the form you need to provide two forms of identification, one with your name and a photograph (passport or driving licence) and the other with your current address (a recent utility bill or bank statement) and a cheque or postal order for the appropriate sum’.

If any self-employed tutors have any useful experience of the above methods, let us know; it has also been discussed in a thread on the Tutor Pages forum.

Finally, something should be said on how effective DBS checks actually are in protecting children. As anyone who looks into this will discover, there is a huge amount of heated debate, and very little evidence-based research. Recent government announcements, however, seems to be moving towards the recognition that paper credentials are no substitute for real human vigilance, a position held by many professionals in this area. For example, Lord Taylor of Holbeach, Minister for Criminal Information, noted in a recent statement that,

“it is also important that employers do not just rely on checks by the DBS to make recruitment decisions. They have a professional duty to ensure that staff are properly managed and supervised and that, if they have concerns, information is referred to both the police and the DBS”.

I shall be exploring the issue of child protection in the private tuition context in a blog post later this year.

Leave a Reply