Archive for November, 2010

Children’s Right to One-to-One Tuition is Axed

Friday, November 12th, 2010

The Government has removed the ringfencing of funds which gave struggling pupils in England the automatic right to one-to-one catch up tuition.

Michael Gove made the announcement as part of the government’s review of funding for schools.

Headteachers will now have to decide whether to sign up for the one-to-one tuition programmes, using money allocated to them from the national schools budget.

Despite sustained difficulties in finding enough qualified tutors, the one-to-one tuition programmes have been widely accepted as very effective in raising standards in reading and numeracy, as I discussed a year ago. 40 hours of one-to-one reading assistance has been shown to help improve the reading age of children by almost two years, and after 20 hours of coaching the average gain in numeracy is more than a year.

One-to-one tuition works – yet some headteachers will be forced to withdraw their support for these programmes because of budgetary constraints.

And as the BBC reported today, for political reasons headteachers will not even have access to all the facts they need to make their decision, since ‘Every Child a Chance Trust – which runs the Every Child a Reader and Every Child Counts schemes for 60,000 primary school pupils – has been asked to delay the publication of research which could persuade head teachers of the effectiveness of their programme’.

See the BBC News article for more details.

“It isn’t necessary to touch children in order to demonstrate. There’s always a better way”

Friday, November 5th, 2010

Keeping Children Safe in Music is a new joint initiative between the Musicians Union, the NSPCC, Youth Music, and the ABRSM (Associated Board of the Royal Schools of Music).

As part of this project, the MU now has 5 videos up on their Youtube site to help music teachers to ‘gain a better understanding of their child protection responsibilities and avoid situations that could lead to accusations of misconduct’.

Of course the aims are laudable, but I’m not convinced by these videos.

In particular, the third video in the series entitled ‘Inappropriate Demonstration’ depicts a caricatured version of teacher-pupil contact, and contains the statement “It isn’t necessary to touch children in order to demonstrate. There’s always a better way” (01:16).

Personally, I do not believe this is correct, and it reminds me of the issues that Jennie Bristow and Frank Furedi were so helpful in unpacking in their book Licensed to Hug (now in its second edition).

As an Alexander Technique teacher, I know that verbal instruction and demonstration are not enough to change habit patterns (in fact, we have a term for it: ‘unreliable sensory appreciation’). In this profession, ‘not touching’ is simply not an option, and I know that many music teachers feel the same.

***UPDATE***

Follow the discussion on this topic on the ABRSM forum here: www.abrsm.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=44570